Le lundi 09 juin 2008 à 18:59 +0200, Per Olofsson a écrit : > Eric Dorland wrote: > > As to whether to include Iceweasel over epiphany (or whatever) in the > > gnome task, that's probably the gnome team's call. However, Iceweasel > > is clearly the more popular one and 3.0 does have better integration > > with Gnome (at least look at feel wise). > > FWIW, Iceweasel 3.0 also incorporates some of Epiphany's features, namely > bookmark tagging and bookmark typeahead finding from the location bar.
And still: * it does not follow the HIG (which is, after theming and icons, the most important thing when it comes to look and feel); * there is no network-manager integration; * there is no avahi integration; * there is no support for notifications; and I probably forget some. There are definitely some nice improvements in iceweasel 3.0 when it comes to GNOME integration (especially the proxy settings, the beginning of GTK+ icon theme support and native widgets), but it still looks like a second-class browser to me in this context. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée