On Sunday 27 July 2008 20:37:13 Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2008-07-27 19:30 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On Sunday 27 July 2008 18:50:36 Sven Joachim wrote: > >> The liblzo2-2 package is of priority "Important", AFAICS there is no > >> justification whatsoever for this. > > > > It is a dependency of libgnutls13, which also has priority "important". > > Ah, I see. The libgnutls13 package has already been removed from > unstable, but is still present in lenny. So the liblzo2-2 priority can > only be downgraded after #475663 is fixed.
In bug #492600, I am now requesting that libgnutls26 also be linked against liblzo2-2. I don't know if or when that will happen, but if it does, the priority would have to remain important. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
