gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:42:19 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > >>> I don't think the severity is warranted; debian/copyrights lists >>> the place where the upstream sources were fetched at the time of >>> packaging. After all web sites are in flux all the time, that's >>> why we distribute them through our mirror network. >> I chose the severity because it's a violation of a 'must' clause in the >> policy (and that's what reportbug advised to set). Of course, I'm very >> much aware about the fact that web sites change all the time, but I >> also do find it very important to properly track upstream sources. > > I agree that this is technically a policy violation, OTOH it's not > really difficult to find the module on CPAN: > http://search.cpan.org/dist/FCGI/ > >> Other than that, I'm inclined to do an NMU to close the bug - the >> change is trivial and doesn't affect functionality in the slightest, >> after all. Therefore, letting the change through should only be a >> formality. > > Sure, but having an upload just for this line doesn't really help, > and bringing the package up2date might be unwanted during the freeze. > > Since Luk has changed the severity I'd appreciate an input from the > release team's side.
>From the Release Team's point of view this issue is not release critical so I downgraded it to important. As the maintainers are active, I don't think there should be any NMU. Though if the maintainers think it's worth to fix before the release, it's a change that probably would get a freeze exception. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]