On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Yeah, I think this change looks good enough, but I guess it should
also be okay to point to libstdc++-dev. Thoughts?
Junichi, actually YOU are my expert about dynamic libraries. I've
thought you might have had some reason to specify the version number.
If YOU see no reason to keep it - just drop it. I'm kind of illiterate
in this field and just realised that 4.1 is wrong and pins a package
I wanted to remove from my box.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
