On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I was mostly VAC while the discussion was going on, and I think I
missed the discussion. Andreas, do you have a good patch that I can
apply, or do I need to think through to get my way around it ?
No I do actually not have a *good* patch.
The following patch I digged up from the past logs should probably be
revised ?
Well it is no solution but rather a workaround. Today I would use
libstdc++6-4.3-dev (and I actually use this workaround in copies of
your tools in the debian directory of my packages). I have no idea
how to reliably obtain the version libstdc++6 and thus I would try
to discuss the issue on debian-devel.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--- /usr/bin/d-devlibdeps 2008-02-28 00:32:40.000000000 +0100
+++ d-devlibdeps 2008-04-18 18:55:15.000000000 +0200
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
-e 's/libatk-1.0-0-dev/libatk1.0-dev/' \
-e 's/libxml2-2-dev/libxml2-dev/' \
-e 's/libgthread-2.0-0-dev/libglib2.0-dev/' \
- -e 's/libstdc++6-dev/libstdc++6-4.1-dev/' \
+ -e 's/libstdc++6-dev/libstdc++6-4.2-dev/' \
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/#/-e}" \
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
