also sprach Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.17.0751 +0200]:
> This comes from a discussion in debian-devel. In that discussion, the
> existence of the pam_umask module was also mentioned.
> 
> Hence, I suggest that, when commenting the UMASK setting in the default
> login.defs file, we add the above comments along with a pointer to
> pam_umask and maybe the relevant Debian package. 

Even without pam_umask, the login.defs setting would only affect
console logins, unless bash was used, which overrides them. zsh, for
instance, does not specify a umask, so it gets 022 by default, and
login.defs' value on the console. With the existence of all these
corner cases, I would say: remove, and add a comment to refer people
to /etc/profile (or equivalent) and libpam-umask.

-- 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
"and the sea isn't green
 and i love the queen
 and what exactly is a dream?
 and what exactly is a joke?"
                                                        -- syd barrett

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to