On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:13:05AM +0100, Lars Bensmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:05:01AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > Is udevsettle safe for usage? Or is it expected to be replaced by
> > 'udevadm settle' ?
>
> Mmmh. I just found some filed bugs for Gentoo and Archlinux, but nothing
> for Debian. But they state that udevsettle is deprecated. So I guess,
> 'udevadm settle' is the way to go.
We have an ugly "fix" for it in the script (the loop that waits for
/dev/zap/ctl), but it's, well, ugly. udevsettle indeed seems like a much
better idea. It will require more testing and thus I'll check it
upstream.
I have already commited a fix to the other issue you mentioned, which is
a minor issue with very minor risk, just in case we get to upload a new
version of this package.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
