Hello, 2009 m. February 27 d., Friday, Joshua Rodman rašė: > If the emacs feature of cmake must depend upon emacs-common, then the > correct solution is to break this feature into cmake-emacs-whatever, > recommend that, and have that depend upon emacs-common. Just for the sake of small syntax highlithing files? That's called archive bloat.
> Installing undesired irrelevant infrastructure isn't entirely innocuous. > It's a sort of a feature-creep problem. Unless you provide me with good rationalle (e.g. how emacsen-common breaks/bloats/whatever your system), I don't consider this as a problem at all. And no, such arguments as "I don't want to have anything *emacs* installed" do not really count for me. > This may be of lesser importance than the original problem, but it's > still bad. Should I open an independent bug? Well, you can, but I will close or tag it wontfix immediatelly unless you provide really good justified arguments for me to change my mind. So far, I have not heard any (only your personal opinion that it is wrong). -- Modestas Vainius <modes...@vainius.eu>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
