Package: cruft Version: 0.9.12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable
In february, I've upgraded my Etch to Lenny. But (for the results of cruft) I thought, it failed - so I decided recently to make a new install (with nearly the same packages). After this, another check with cruft: the result is nearly identical: masses of files are reported as 'missing' although they exist (as far as I've checked it; mainly from /etc, /usr/lib and /usr/share) and even much more files are reported as 'unexplained' (also mainly from /etc, /usr/lib and /usr/share). The latter also can't be true; there have been hardly any and certainly no severe errors reported while the re-installation. And the re-installation of some critizized/concerned packages couldn't change anything on this result as well. Also the reported errors in /etc/alternatives seem to be none (I can't find anything wrong with these link-chains). Solely the named dead-links seem to be correct (some packages seem to install them routinely). I think, the correct working of cruft is really important for verifying the consistence of a system - therefore here my frst bug-report. Thanks for reading and eventually working on it... Faunus -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages cruft depends on: ii file 4.26-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii libc6 2.7-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries cruft recommends no packages. cruft suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
