On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:09:33 -0400 lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: > > > Well that's the problem then. So far it was only tested and > > > setup to work with module-assistant and linux-modules-2.6-nonfree. > > Should it not depend on module-assistant then? > > No, since you can use module assistant, or you can have it built using > linux-modules-2.6-nonfree (just as soon as we get it enabled in that). > It doesn't require module-assistant, but it does work with it if you > choose to use it. > > I do plan to make it work with make-kpkg again soon (which I > unfortunately broke as part of making it work with 2.6.29 and > linux-modules-2.6-nonfree). > > > > What arguments/environment do you pass along to binary_modules? > > > It was never meant to be used without arguments after all. > > KSRC=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 > > KVERS=2.6.26-2-amd64 > > Well if you passed along a VERSION= as well, it would probably work. > > Something like: > VERSION=180.44-2+2.6.29-3 > > That would match what module-assistant is setting it to. That is > whatever the version of the nvidia package is plus whatever the > version of the kernel headers package is. ok, but I maybe will give module-assistant a try.
-- Mvh Anders Lagerås
pgpQ0NIr97z2p.pgp
Description: PGP signature