> Savvas, please would you compare yours with it, and if you have any > suggestions/improvements on the packaging let me know about it so they > can be merged? Thanks
Hello! Here is a summary of changes: - 0.3.0 is out :) - You should have a debian/watch file - I didn't make one since I'm based on git. Here's a suggestion: version=3 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnote/(?:[\d\w\.]+)/gnote-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 (It works, but I don't know if it's correct, I'm not that good with custom debian/watch files, e.g. ./0.3/gnote-0.3.0) - I have split the package into 3 different ones: gnote (binary), gnote-data (data without compilation), gnote-addins (binary) - I am using boost 1.37 or boost 1.35 or boost - I don't know if that's good, but at least it gives more testing control over various boost libraries: libboost1.37-dev | libboost1.35-dev | libboost-dev, libboost-filesystem1.37-dev | libboost-filesystem1.35-dev | libboost-filesystem-dev, libboost-regex1.37-dev | libboost-regex1.35-dev | libboost-regex-dev, libboost-iostreams1.37-dev | libboost-iostreams1.35-dev | libboost-iostreams-dev, libboost-test1.37-dev | libboost-test1.35-dev | libboost-test-dev, - I've also set versioned dependencies, based on autoconf and ./configure: automake (>= 1.9), autoconf (>= 2.53), pkg-config (>= 0.14.0), libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.14), [...] intltool (>= 0.35), gnome-doc-utils (>= 0.4.2), - For some reason, during document compilation/creation, it requires rarian-compat package. I don't know if that's required for Debian, but on ubuntu it was spitting errors (maybe the situation changed with newer releases). - I'm using debhelper 7 debian/rules without cdbs: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~medigeek/%2Bjunk/gnote-packaging/annotate/head%3A/debian/rules http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~medigeek/%2Bjunk/gnote-packaging/files/head%3A/debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org