On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 08:08:39AM +0200, Savvas Radevic wrote: > - 0.3.0 is out :)
I just updated the package in http://people.debian.org/~rmh/gnote/ > - You should have a debian/watch file - I didn't make one since I'm > based on git. Here's a suggestion: Added, thanks. > - I have split the package into 3 different ones: gnote (binary), > gnote-data (data without compilation), gnote-addins (binary) This might make sense, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to decide about package split just yet. > - I am using boost 1.37 or boost 1.35 or boost - I don't know if > that's good, but at least it gives more testing control over various > boost libraries: > libboost1.37-dev | libboost1.35-dev | libboost-dev, > libboost-filesystem1.37-dev | libboost-filesystem1.35-dev | > libboost-filesystem-dev, > libboost-regex1.37-dev | libboost-regex1.35-dev | libboost-regex-dev, > libboost-iostreams1.37-dev | libboost-iostreams1.35-dev | > libboost-iostreams-dev, > libboost-test1.37-dev | libboost-test1.35-dev | libboost-test-dev, I'll talk to upstream to see which version of boost is preferred. > - I've also set versioned dependencies, based on autoconf and ./configure: > automake (>= 1.9), > autoconf (>= 2.53), > pkg-config (>= 0.14.0), > libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.14), > [...] > intltool (>= 0.35), > gnome-doc-utils (>= 0.4.2), Added, thanks. Except for automake (not needed) and gtk (>= 2.12 is enough now). > - For some reason, during document compilation/creation, it requires > rarian-compat package. I don't know if that's required for Debian, but > on ubuntu it was spitting errors (maybe the situation changed with > newer releases). No idea. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
