Sven Mueller wrote: > Alexander Gerasiov wrote: > >>'[[' is bash'ism and should be replaced. >> >>You can check your scripts with dash which is small and >>installed-on-every-Sarge POSIX shell. > > > Interesting, I only started using the [[ "test" equivalent when I had > read about this being available on any posix shell. Unfortunately, I > can't find the relevant webpage anymore. Oh well, I suppose that any > modern system can spare those additional forks (which sum up to approx. > 10ms on any run of that init script). forks? As I understand modern shells has internal test (and [) functionality
You can look in bash(1) for string "enable -n test" So you shouldn't care about such forks. Regards, Alexander. PS Thanks for a quick fix. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
