forcemerge 538218 538009
thanks

Hello,

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:48:22 +0200 Eduard Bloch wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> first, you are right. But: the problem comes from wicd itself in the
> first place, therefore I open a second bug report.
> 
> AFAICS the WM icon data is crappy:
> 
> xprop | grep ICON | tr ',' '\n' | gview -
>   62521   62529  406342
> 
> Sorry, what is that? Wasting 240 KiB of X server memory JUST FOR ICONS?
> (Or maybe a half MiB on 64bit systems, not sure which data type it uses
> for RGBA data).

How did you get that data?

> I checked the contents, we have there:
> 32x32 version, 64x64, 96x96, 128x128, 36x36, 192x192 versions, in this
> order, and the last image is not even complete but maybe because xprop
> is running into its own buffer limits.

How did you "check the contents"?

> This all does not make sense. The order is unusual, the last icons are
> huge for no reason, and 36px version is uncommon - who needs it?
> Usualy applications use 48, 32, 16 versions, in descending order (by
> size).

I'd be glad to fix this, and possibly push a patch upstream. But, I can't
simply reproduce this :)

(maybe I should just install icewm?)

Kindly,
David

-- 
 . ''`.  Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to