Hi

Dne Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:40:20 -0700
"Todd A. Jacobs" <tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56...@codegnome.org> napsal(a):

> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:14:05PM +0200, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
> 
> > It needs to cause failure on installation or otherwise rpm would
> > complain on every start.
> 
> The package does not complete installation as a result, so this is most
> definitely a bug that should be reopened. Leaving a package in a
> partially-installed state is never the right thing to do.
> 
> The rpm package was installed as an alien dependency, and this error was
> encountered when doing an upgrade. To the best of my knowledge, I've
> never used alien, so there really shouldn't have been anything in the
> rpm database. Even if there was, refusing to complete the installation
> is still not the correct thing to do.

I fixed the bug meanwhile as it was caused by missing dependencies -
you did not get installed some configuration which is now separated in
rpm-common package.

-- 
        Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to