Hi Dne Thu, 3 Sep 2009 08:40:20 -0700 "Todd A. Jacobs" <tjacobs-kw-reportbug.e56...@codegnome.org> napsal(a):
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:14:05PM +0200, Michal ??iha?? wrote: > > > It needs to cause failure on installation or otherwise rpm would > > complain on every start. > > The package does not complete installation as a result, so this is most > definitely a bug that should be reopened. Leaving a package in a > partially-installed state is never the right thing to do. > > The rpm package was installed as an alien dependency, and this error was > encountered when doing an upgrade. To the best of my knowledge, I've > never used alien, so there really shouldn't have been anything in the > rpm database. Even if there was, refusing to complete the installation > is still not the correct thing to do. I fixed the bug meanwhile as it was caused by missing dependencies - you did not get installed some configuration which is now separated in rpm-common package. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature