Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:41:59AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: >> Peter Pentchev wrote: >>> As of writing, its only >>> well-developed application is the provisioning of Internet domain names, >>> hosts, and related contact details. >> What about Net::DRI? Never used but heard good words about it. > > Well, I've never used Net::DRI either, although it looks good. > Still, I think there would be no harm in also having Net::EPP in > Debian, since it is useful in its own right - easy to use, quite > customizable, usable for lots of EPP-compatible registrars with > only small registrar-specific changes. At $REALJOB, we've been > using it internally for EURid for quite some time now, with only > a simple change of an XML element's namespace to make it work. > > Of course, if the community feels that it is redundant, I can > always maintain it myself outside of Debian, no worries :) Oh, you misunderstood, I wasn't suggesting to not include it in Debian; I was just wondering how the two packages relate or compare with each other.
Thanks, Faidon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
