On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:47:08PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:28:43PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Many thanks in advance, > > BTW, I forgot to mention, it is of course totally up to you to decide > whether let my delayed NMU flow in or not. I doubt it will do any harm, > so I would personally let it go, but you might know reasons why you > prefer to stop it (note that also the 2 previous kaffe versions have > been NMUed). > > Do you have any specific showstopper for filing a removal request RoM > right ahead?
The only showstopper I can think is that the built kaffe VM might not work. I remember problems when a) gcc and gcj ha different major versions or b) gcc was > 4.2 due to stricter aliasing rules. I dont know if these problems still apply. We dont filed a RoM yet because there are still some packages tied to kaffe and not all are maintained by the pkg-java-maintainers. So this needs some coordination before we tell ftp-master to remove kaffe for real. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
