Hi Robert and other doc-base people, Frank Küster <[email protected]> wrote:
> I suggest to add a section for this, but to not use the name TeX > (Editing/TeX is plainly wrong for most of them). Rather, I would like > to make the section broader, and include everything related to > typesetting. Any news on this? On the Debian TeX list, we got a request whether a graphical frontend for producing graphics code for TeX should be put into Graphics or TeX - and we had to answer that TeX formally doesn't exist... We continue using it, since it's established and known. I'd very much prefer, however, to be able to switch to "Typesetting" or something similar as suggested in the bug report. Agustin - I am unsure which section would fit best. I think the user base of ktikz will mostly consist of (La)TeX users who don't want to learn the complete syntax of tikz, or want to "draw" the basic forms of their graphics with a frontend, before tweaking in the generated code. Therefore, TeX might be better than Graphics, but I have no strong opinion about it. In particular since TeX doesn't exist in theory... Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
