Robert Luberda <[email protected]> wrote: >> We continue using it, since it's established and known. I'd very much >> prefer, however, to be able to switch to "Typesetting" or something >> similar as suggested in the bug report. > > OK, I can add the Typesetting section soon, probably next week. > However I need to know two things: > - where the section should be in sections hierarchy? Should it be a > top-level section or should it be placed under some other section (for > example under Editors)?
It doesn't have to do anything with Editors as I understand it. One could argue putting it under Office; however, this section has no subsection so far - and, on the other hand, creating nicely typeset timetables or mail-order catalogs from a database isn't exactly office work. So I'd vote for a top-level section. > - what would be description of the section? Could you please think up a > short sentence describing the section, which would be suitable for the > chapter `2.3.3 The section field' of the Debian doc-base Policy? What about: Software for typesetting text and graphics from structured input files like LaTeX or docbook sources, database exports etc. [database export is a bit cludgy, since it's not a complete export, rather some query "piped" through a filter and formatter, but being forgein to databases I don't know a better phrase] > If I understand correctly, the Typesetting section would replace the > officially non-existent Tex section. So it would be a great idea to add > also a TeX->Typesetting section's mapping in doc-base. Am I right? Yes, that would be a good idea. There are a couple of other packages, however, that should also be there (see the original report) and are not in "TeX" currently. I'll file bugs about those I know of. Many thanks in advance, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
