Hi! :) * Jochen Friedrich <[email protected]> [2009-12-15 17:35:08 CET]: >> It would had been much more helpful if the stuff that you introduced >> in 5.4.2.1~dfsg-1 would have stayed around until the extra package is >> ready to use. I can understand from reading the bugreports why you >> chose this path - but really, not having the other package ready >> rather opens new bugs instead of fixing those. :) > > Isn't testing just what the name says? :)
I see the smiley, but no. ;) Actually, experimental would be that area. > At least this way around all packages have a chance to pop up that > don't work without the MIBs. Erm, they would pop up anyway because the download facility you had in the package can't be active by default, and the package you ITPed has a different name (and would still not contain them). > According to Bug #557434 any package which would need the MIBs can't > stay in main. That's correct, but a completely different part of the issue. :) Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
