Hi, On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:45:51AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > I'm not going to start a severity war, we'll do our best to fix this for > the release anyway. I'll just note that `important' has traditionally > been the severity for perl bugs that crash the interpreter and don't > affect many packages.
you do not have to. I was wrong, thats it. I just stretched the meaning of the critical severity to far. My reaction derives from the feeling that its somehow strange that a package that does not actually contain a bug is considered release-critical buggy while the package which causes the bug isn't. Anyway I'm pretty sure that the perl maintainers do a good job and it will be fixed until the release (hopefully more early) so its okay anyway. Thanks for your -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
