Hi, On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:56:12AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 17:29 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:2010/1/20 Frank Lin PIAT <fp...@klabs.be>: > On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 02:13 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote: >> >> The MoinMoin developers have released moin-1.9.1. This release fixes a >> security issue¹. It provides also a lot small bug fixes. > > I've attached a patch for the security update, backporting upstream's > security update in 1.9.1 (as 1.9.0-1+squeeze1 so it can be uploaded with > urgency = high)Is there any reason why this shouldn't be uploaded to unstable (or the new upstream release even)? or why do you use that version name?Hello, It is intended to be uploaded to unstable. (If you ask this, I suppose I shouldn't have named it "+squeeze1")
I am alive - just pretty busy :-/I'll prepare and upload a standard upgrade of python-moin to the new upstream security-bug release 1.9.1, and will target it unstable with urgency high.
Does there exist some CVE or similar that we should include? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
