On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 01:40:07PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I agree with Andreas here: we already have other ways to classify software, in > particular with the Debtags, and to group packages, in particular with the > Blends tasks, so fragmenting the sections will only introduce doubts and > controversy about multi-purpose software.
Yes, but as long as we are also using the archive sections, we should improve them. > How about renaming the Science section “Science and Education” (or “Education > and Scicence”, it does not matter to me). The content of the ‘Section’ field > in > the Debian control files could stay ‘science’, since if I understand the > problem, what matters here is the processed information that our users see on > our website. We will always have software fitting in several section, and we never will solve that problem as long as we use them. What you propose sounds like a bad workaround, specially because I can understand “Science and Education” as application that are both: science and education. Would linguistic apps fit there? Neither we can have sections for everything but in the case of educative software I think we have plenty of software falling under this category. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org