Package: libgsl0-dev
Version: 1.11+dfsg-1
Severity: normal

When i try to compile the ROOT system on my machine (with MathMore feature enabled) ./configure complains:

==========
Checking whether /usr/lib/libgslcblas.a is compiled with -fPIC
Checking if /usr/lib/libgslcblas.a contains relocatable code
ar t /usr/lib/libgslcblas.a | awk '{ if (NR==1) {print $1 } }'
ar x /usr/lib/libgslcblas.a sasum.o
objdump -r sasum.o | grep 'R_X86_64_32'
result: 0
is not a relocatable library
Result: no
Checking whether to build libMathMore
Result: no
==========

whereas for libgsl.a:

====================
Checking whether /usr/lib/libgsl.a is compiled with -fPIC
Checking if /usr/lib/libgsl.a contains relocatable code
ar t /usr/lib/libgsl.a | awk '{ if (NR==1) {print $1 } }'
ar x /usr/lib/libgsl.a version.o
objdump -r version.o | grep 'R_X86_64_32'
result: 1
Result: yes
==================

if you could add the -fPIC flag for cblas for x86_64 that would be helpful.

thanks

Les



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
 APT prefers stable
 APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libgsl0-dev depends on:
ii libgsl0ldbl 1.11+dfsg-1 GNU Scientific Library (GSL) -- li

libgsl0-dev recommends no packages.

libgsl0-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to