On 27 April 2010 at 12:35, Les Schaffer wrote:
| Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
| > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
| > which was filed against the libgsl0-dev package:
| >
| > #579404: libgslcblas.a needs compiling with -fPIC
| >
| > It has been closed by Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>.
|
| how *ON EARTH* can you close a bug before i had a chance to answer your
| question!?!?!?!??!!?
i) As explained, -fPIC is already used. That is a GSL upstream decision. I
neither add not remove to it. If there is someone you need to convince,
it is GSL upstream.
ii) As explained, nobody should use libgslcblas anyway. Google for it. In
almost all cases you are better off using Atlas or another tuned blas.
In short, you have an issue with either one or both of GSL and ROOT upstream
and are hence barking up the wrong tree.
Hope this helps, Dirk
|
| dude, look at the bug report i sent. it shows how the ROOT system tried
| to detect -fPIC. if their scheme is incorrect, i will gladly notify
| CERN/ROOT team. but if its easy to turn on -fPIC for the static version
| of libgslcblas.a (your /usr/lib/libgsl.a happily passes their test),
| then why not.
|
| Les
|
|
--
Regards, Dirk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
