Hello Jochen, thanks for your reply. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:38, Jochen Friedrich <joc...@scram.de> wrote: > Hi Sandro, > >> a 0-day NMU for a quite recent bug report is quite rude from the >> maintainer POV, in particular because you didn't ping the bug neither >> you post a patch on the bug report (as required by devref) and you >> didn't upload to a DELAYED queue, giving time to the maintainer to >> react. Funny how the MU came only minutes after your NMU, another sign >> of un-coordinated NMU. > > If you have a look at http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu, you'll see > that I accept this sort of NMU for all packages except for the net-snmp one > (here I just require anyone to resgister as co-maintainer and add the > package to SVN first, BTW. Otherwise, the history in SVN becomes a mess). > > In this case I was just preparing to fix a piupart error and finally decided > to push it out now that a RC bug was rised. I don't think this NMU caused a > lot of work on Matthias ;-)
that doesn't change the fact there are some rules for NMUs, and one of them is posting the diff to the BTS, that didn't happen (and uploading to DELAYED/2 would be nice). Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
