On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 14:16 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > On 2010/6/4 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > [...] > > Well, everything seems to work now, all four bugs are closed, and it > > runs. I think I'm going to merge the salome, libsalome5.1.3-0, > > libsalome-dev and python2.5-salome binary packages, then declare victory > > and upload -9. If that gets into testing, I'll be happy. > > > > Sounds good? > > Did you check by running binary-arch target only, as mentioned in my > first reply? I am surprised that it works, I would expect that all > packages listed in Build-Depends-Indep should be moved into > Build-Depends, but I did not try to build it. If only doxygen had to > be moved, this is of course fine.
Ah, right, I didn't use pbuilder, so I likely had all of the Build-Depends-Indep packages installed already. I'm surprised that any of those are needed for binary-arch. Without them, configure should just report that they're not there. But they shouldn't ever be invoked except in a binary or binary-indep invocation. I'll give it another try without them, and whatever Build-Depends are needed, then upload if appropriate. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
