On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:38:25 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:

> #562945 is definitly serious and I'm sorry that I don't have the time to read 
> policy for you. I also havent up my mind whether I should reassign this bug 
> to the NM committee or the tech committee. Seriously. A package has to 
> install without issues. Full stop.
> 

          For high-priority prompts without a reasonable default answer,
          maintainer scripts may abort if there is no controlling
          terminal.

Replacing /sbin/init sounds high-priority to me, so it seems to me
policy disagrees with you.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to