I wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#562945: Bug#582755: Bug#562945: fails to
> install"):
> > In summary, my proposal would be to:
> >
> > - decline to override the runit-run maintainer, whose use of debconf is
> > discouraged but /not/ forbidden by Policy
> > - advise the Policy maintainers to proceed with the existing proposed
> > language regarding high-priority prompts
> > - refer the question of overall releasability of runit-run to the Release
> > Team
>
> I agree. I see that in #224509 Russ writes that the new wording has
> been merged for the next release.
Just for the avoidance of doubt, we need to say clearly that we agree
with the submitters of #562945 and #574223 that the current behaviour
of runinit is a bug. So the bug should remain open and be reassigned
to runinit.
We are not ruling on whether the bug is release criticial, and that
question is part of what the Release Team will have to decide.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
