On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 06:44:18AM -0400, sasha mal wrote: > > Pages optimized for IE6 are not necessarily rendered correctly on IE7 > > or IE8.. so much for Microsofts own "standards". > Man, you still don't get it. MS changed its standard. Standards do change > over time, that's normal. > > >> I can help with investigation of wireshark on debian from late July 2010 > >> if you say exactly what to type in. At this very moment unfortunately no > >> debian, only OS X, sorry. > > Drop me a line then. > > Ok. > > > It seems to me that it is just hard for most programmers to correctly (with > > respect to the standards of Cisco & MS, in case there is a difference to > > RFCs) implement some algorithm, > > which makes the implementation fail in particular networks. > > > The RFCs are the standard, Cisco and MS are not. But Cisco, MS, ... > > try to comply with these standards, afaik. If they didn't the internet > > wouldn't work at all. > > That's wrong. Noone tries to comply with each other, at least not too hard. > RFCs describe how the HTTP should work in their opinion. Cisco and MS do the > world, using those write-ups as a small notice, but primarily they use their > own internal documentation, code and hardware which much better depicts the > reality. Who is right, the opus writers or the programmers and hardware > builders? > > > The W3C does the HTML-standards Microsoft used to blatantly ignore. > It's the other way round. > MS does the browser which W3C and the HTML group blatantly ignores. > HTML is non-conformant with the most widespread browser, so it's just wrong > for the majority of users.
Will you just stop the pointless babbling and actually help investigate your bug ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
