> Pages optimized for IE6 are not necessarily rendered correctly on IE7 > or IE8.. so much for Microsofts own "standards". Man, you still don't get it. MS changed its standard. Standards do change over time, that's normal.
>> I can help with investigation of wireshark on debian from late July 2010 if >> you say exactly what to type in. At this very moment unfortunately no >> debian, only OS X, sorry. > Drop me a line then. Ok. > It seems to me that it is just hard for most programmers to correctly (with > respect to the standards of Cisco & MS, in case there is a difference to > RFCs) implement some algorithm, > which makes the implementation fail in particular networks. > The RFCs are the standard, Cisco and MS are not. But Cisco, MS, ... > try to comply with these standards, afaik. If they didn't the internet > wouldn't work at all. That's wrong. Noone tries to comply with each other, at least not too hard. RFCs describe how the HTTP should work in their opinion. Cisco and MS do the world, using those write-ups as a small notice, but primarily they use their own internal documentation, code and hardware which much better depicts the reality. Who is right, the opus writers or the programmers and hardware builders? > The W3C does the HTML-standards Microsoft used to blatantly ignore. It's the other way round. MS does the browser which W3C and the HTML group blatantly ignores. HTML is non-conformant with the most widespread browser, so it's just wrong for the majority of users. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
