On 26.07.2010 10:16, Torsten Werner wrote:
Am 26.07.2010 00:46, schrieb Matthias Klose:
On 25.07.2010 22:23, Torsten Werner wrote:
I am filing 3 removal requests for

- sun-java6/unstable [ia64]
- sun-java6/stable [ia64]
- sun-java5/stable [ia64]

the removal of the stable packages is not required.

I would leave the decision to the stable release manager. But the facts
are: i386 support on our ia64 porterbox is completely broken. The
sun-java5/6 packages for ia64 cannot be used at all because the rely on
i386 support. The binary packages are outdated on ia64 with security
issues because the current source version cannot be built due to the
same problem. That is why I suggest to remove the packages from stable/ia64.

so you say that ia32-libs is broken in stable on ia64? I don't think the correct solution is to remove all r-depending packages because of this.

The better solution would be to fix the i386 support on ia64. But I
cannot help with that since I do not have admin access to any ia64 hardware.

so you did shove in a new major version into stable/security without testing it on ia64 first?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to