Hi Jonas, On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:24:54AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 08:56:13AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: >> both sugar-tools-0.90 and sugar-session-0.90 ar not installable in sid >> on any architecture, since >> >> sugar-session-0.90 (= 0.90.3-1) depends on missing: - python-sugar-0.90 >> sugar-tools-0.90 (= 0.90.3-1) depends on missing: - python-sugar-0.90 >> >> As a consequence, sucrose-0.90 and sugar-emulator-0.90 are not installable >> as well as these depend on sugar-session-90. > > This is weird: I agree with above, but wonder how those packages went > missing - I have notes on succesful upload to unstable for them :-/
maybe it had been kept back because of the freeze? Recently I had encountered a similar problem where a package had disappeared from (or not shown up in) unstable (bug #601071). You might want to ask Al what he did to solve it. Cheers -Ralf. -- Ralf Treinen Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
