Roger Leigh wrote:
> Additionally (not in the patch), I noticed that there is a great deal
> of similarity between the rules.arch, rules.indep and rules.multi
> files.  Is there actually a need for these three separate files rather
> than simply having a single one (based on rules.multi)?

It does not make sense to add build-arch support to rules.indep, which
is for wholely arch-indep packages. Nor the converse for rules.arch.

I have no idea what might use or refer to these example rules files, and
so see no need to mess with them.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to