Quoting Jonathan Nieder (jrnie...@gmail.com): > Package: samba-common-bin > Version: 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3 > Severity: minor > Justification: cosmetic > > Stock squeeze system. /etc/samba/smb.conf as below. Running > testparm, I get a worrying message (the following is censored a > bit): > > $ testparm > Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf > rlimit_max: rlimit_max (1024) below minimum Windows limit (16384) > Processing section "[sharedfiles]" > Loaded services file OK. > Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE > Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions > > [global] > workgroup = SOMETHINGINALLCAPS > server string = Someone's Computer > ; disable guest by mapping to nonexistent user. > map to guest = Bad User > syslog = 0 > log file = /var/log/samba/log.machine > max log size = 1000 > panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d > > [sharedfiles] > comment = Shared files > path = /var/local/shared-files > username = sharedfiles > valid users = sharedfiles > read only = No > $ echo $? > 0 > > Should one be worried about the rlimit_max comment? If there is > anything I can do to help track this down, I'd be glad to hear it.
http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg105543.html I think, from Jeremy's comment, that this bug is not one....
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
