reflum, On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 01:28 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > Thanks for your clarification,
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:46:21AM +0100, Philipp Schafft wrote: > >I suggest to: > >close the bug as invalid (it's not ices2's problem) as the install > does > >exactly what it is suppost to do: it try to set up the system in a > way > >all features works > >OR re-assign it to source package dnprogs which includes libdnet and > >dnet-common and request for some better way to solve this. > > Already done the latter: reassigned to libdnet. Jup. Saw it. > I find it wrong to close it when indeed there _is_ a bug somewhere. It's just that I don't consider this a bug but a missing feature. So I would have a look at it anyway. Some time ago we already had a fix in this direction. I'm currently thing about if we can get dnet-common to support installing in unconfigured mode (we allready support to deconfigure it, just by rm-ing the config file after install). Will have a look at it within the next days, don't know how much work it will be. Are there any plans to request unblock of ices2 2.0.1-9 for squeeze? -- Philipp. (Rah of PH2)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
