On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 18:59 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Well OK, but e.g., the
> Package: info
> Priority: important
> Section: doc
> package doesn't seem to have that many problems.

GNU Info isn't the same thing as Monodoc in any way, shape, or form.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to