On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 16, rleigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote:
> 
> > Not sure why udev is broken; it's using both locations from the
> > look of things.  Maybe something it needs has been written to
> > one and it's not present in the other or something?
> rm -rf /run/udev/ ffs!
> It will not be created again by -2 unless /run really is a tmpfs.

Marco, please read what I wrote.  I provided all the detail to show
what is needed to reproduce the breakage.  If you want any more,
I'll provide it.

/run really is a tmpfs.
udev is broken.

** udev is broken when /run is a tmpfs **

How clearly do I have to say this!

This is broken, right now, with 167-2 in unstable.


Thanks,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to