On Apr 16, rleigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > Whether or not /run is a tmpfs or not is *irrelevant* to whether or > not udev should use it. The choice of filesystem is entirely up to > the admin, and while the default is to use tmpfs, it is not udev's > business to alter its behaviour depending on the filesystem in use > at that location. That's *utterly broken*. I consider it an acceptable tradeoff, I can remove the code when udev will depend on the new sysvinit.
> udev needs a dependency on initscripts, and then it can > *unconditionally* make use of /run without relying on broken hacks. I have no plan to disable the /dev/.udev/ fallback unless it will be clearly proven that it cannot be viable (hint: the alternative is the daemon exiting with an error, which is supposed to be worse). > You're trying to be too clever, and making assumptions that are > not warranted. But so far you have not been able to show what I did wrong. I like to fix bugs, not symptoms. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
