On 21-Jun-2011, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Can you try with the dulwich command ("dulwich clone ...")? That should
> help determine whether this is a bzr-git or a dulwich issue. It gives a different error: ===== $ dulwich clone git+ssh://[email protected]/dive-into-html5/dive-into-html5.git gitorious/ == Gitorious: ========================================================== fatal error ======================================================================== Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dulwich", line 186, in <module> commands[cmd](sys.argv[2:]) File "/usr/bin/dulwich", line 153, in cmd_clone progress=sys.stdout.write) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/dulwich/client.py", line 209, in fetch target.get_graph_walker(), f.write, progress) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/dulwich/client.py", line 223, in fetch_pack (refs, server_capabilities) = self.read_refs(proto) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/dulwich/client.py", line 96, in read_refs for pkt in proto.read_pkt_seq(): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/dulwich/protocol.py", line 147, in read_pkt_seq pkt = self.read_pkt_line() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/dulwich/protocol.py", line 103, in read_pkt_line raise HangupException() dulwich.errors.HangupException: The remote server unexpectedly closed the connection. ===== This error appears after some tens of seconds, and exits with a traceback. That is different from the Bazaar behaviour (which outputs a Gitorious message, then hangs). -- \ “First things first, but not necessarily in that order.” —The | `\ Doctor, _Doctor Who_ | _o__) | Ben Finney <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
