On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 03:24:40PM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: >On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 13:59:22 +0100, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: >> I am, yes. And advertising it to other people too! :-) > >Good to hear that. After a couple of years long hiatus, we are picking up speed >again, so feel free to bother us with issues.
Cool. :-) >> Which version did that feature go into? I don't see any mention of it >> in the changelog or docs... > >A patch from 2001 made it into the code on 2009-08-16 >https://github.com/nicolas33/offlineimap/commit/cde94e50 > >Check offlineimap.conf for specifics :): ># The maximum size should be specified in bytes - e.g. 20000 ># maxsize = 2000000 > >It will simply treat larger messages as non-existent, so they will not >show up on the other side. Excellent, that's exactly how I wanted it. :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary." -- James D. Nicoll -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
