Hi. Thanks for reporting. I also checked out your report on gputils site. So you're saying
- gputils-0.13.4 works - gputils-0.13.5 generates totally different hex, and won't work - gputils-0.13.7 generates similar hex to 0.13.4, but still won't work right? Could you provide me the problematic C source code so I can verify the issue? > Package: gputils > Version: 0.13.7-1 > > Hi, > I am facing problems compiling c code for pic16f88 since years. > In the beginning I was using an old debian 4.0 32bit system and with sdcc I > was able to get good .hex files. > When I moved to debian 5.0 64bit the .hex generated (still with sdcc) were > broken and my programmer refused to burn them to the pic. The same happens > now with debian 6.0 64bit. > > First I thought that the problem was in sdcc, but from hints by sdcc guy and > the last tests I did, I verified the same intermediate .asm files on both > systems (the working one and the non-workgin one) mentioned above (except > some commented lines). > > Trying to track the problem I think I found something: on my new debian 6.0 > 64bit system I can get the correct .hex if I use gputils-0.13.4 compiled > from source. > If I use gputils-0.13.5 compiled from source I get .hex files messed up a > lot. > If I use gputils-0.13.7 compiled from source I get .hex files quite similar > to the ones generated by gputils-0.13.4, but with few lines different, and > they do not work. > > I also wrote to gputils bug tracking system almost one month ago, but I > suspect that nobody is taking care of that bugs submissions. > > If you need further informations just ask. > > Ciao, > Luca > > > .-------------------------------------. > -=<(§ Luca <morpheus AT ferrara.linux.it> §)>=- > °-------------------------------------° -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
