On 08/12/2011 06:27 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> David, can you advise to what extent the results of this whitelist
> test could be useful, for example to populate our blacklist? The
> number of non-inlined kernel functions is far greater than 963, so
> perhaps this default test run just looked at those functions listed by
> the various tapsets. If so, one'd need to add gross patterns like
> kernel.function("*").call to give the kernel a manlier workout.
The whitelist test is pretty old, and should probably be removed. The
stuff in scripts/kprobes_test is much closer to what I think you want,
but of course it doesn't use systemtap, it tests "raw" kprobes. It
probably wouldn't be that difficult to modify
scripts/kprobes_test/gen_code.py to produce a systemtap module instead
of a "raw" kprobes module.
--
David Smith
dsm...@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
