On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:54 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:51:08AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:27:56 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > Any updates here? As a udev reverse dependency this is quite important > > > for earlt multi-arch conversion. > > > It'll probably happen on the next upload, but I'm not going to rush > > that. (What does this have to do with udev?) > > Looks like an ubuntuisim. needed inderectly for animated startup graphics, > sigh. No hurry on debian side then it seems.
libdrm-intel now depends on libpciaccess, plymouth depends on libdrm-intel, and so on. The -dev package shouldn't be marked as multiarch; the i386 package is not parallel installable with the amd64 package as they both ship /usr/include. In general, my understanding is that -dev packages should not be multiarched (yet). I should apparently also read Debian bug reports more often. I'd just pushed a dh7 cleanup branch which also adds multiarch to the debian-experimental git branch before reading this mail.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
