On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 23:03 +0200, Guido van Steen wrote:
> Dear Adam, 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > Violations of "should" directives in policy are not RC bugs.
> 
> You are the release manager, so you must be right about this. 

:-)  Or need convincing as to why I'm wrong.

> However, I was guided by reportbug, which told me that violations of
> "should" directives are serious. I guess I should have used another
> version of reportbug, perhaps the one available in sid or in wheezy!?
> OTOH I was using olpc-powerd on squeeze. 

afaict, the versions in both sid and squeeze only mention "must" or
"required" being serious:

    'serious' : """is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is,
    the problem is a violation of a 'must' or 'required' directive);
    may or may not affect the usability of the package.  Note that non-severe
    policy violations may be 'normal,' 'minor,' or 'wishlist' bugs.

(/usr/share/pyshared/reportbug/debianbts.py, reportbug 4.12.6)

Was this in the English text, or a translation?

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to