On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:18:01 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote: > > > Can we decrease the severity of this bug to return the freecad back to > > testing? > > Why? > I think the bug is still unfixed and still serious, unfortunately. > > > The bug filed on March, but freecad was removed from testing on May > > because of FTBFS's (I think). > > Yes, but I think freecad should not be released in a stable version > (again) with this serious issue unsolved.
Indeed, a package with a copyright/licensing issue can't go into a release, and can't go into testing. IMO this isn't an issue, and the fact that Debian allowed it into unstable and the squeeze release indicates that the project probably doesn't think so either. (Ubuntu has had Freecad since from lucid to oneiric, so they don't seem to think there's a OCTPL-GPL incompatibility either.) But until there's an official ruling on this issue, the package can't go any further in Debian. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
