Hi Kevin, I use
PAW > graphics/opt zfl1 PAW > fun1 1 sin(x) 100 0. 3. PAW > pic/print paw.ps > Does it make any difference if you manually edit a copy of the original > PAW-created postscript file so that the above lines instead read as follows > [...] > %%EndProlog > %%Page: number 1 > %%BeginPageSetup > newpath gsave 20 28 t .25 .25 scale gsave > %%EndPageSetup No, this gives the same result (i.e. a white paper). ... I stumbled across the following: I deleted the BeginSetup EndSetup pair from the postscript file, ie I deleted line 89 %%BeginSetup left line 90 as is and deleted line 91 %%EndSetup This then gives the error as described on the cern paw pages. When I use "fixps" , it re-introduces the %%BeginSetup %%EndSetup pair, but - surprise - without including the gsave, thus the diff between the original and the "sanitized" file is 90d89 < newpath gsave 20 28 t .25 .25 scale gsave 91a91 > newpath gsave 20 28 t .25 .25 scale gsave Or explicitely %%EndProlog %%BeginSetup newpath gsave 20 28 t .25 .25 scale gsave %%EndSetup %%Page: number 1 becomes %%EndProlog %%BeginSetup %%EndSetup newpath gsave 20 28 t .25 .25 scale gsave %%Page: number 1 and that one prints fine via cups on the postscript printer. Best regards Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
