Le Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:45:09 +0100, Antonio Valentino <antonio.valent...@tiscali.it> a écrit :
> Hi Frédéric-Emmanuel, > > Il 02/01/2012 19:39, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel ha scritto: > > Hello, I am a DD and I would like to see the new upstream version in debian. > > So dear maintainer is it ok for you to offer co-maintainance of pytables to > > Yaroslav Halchenko. > > > > Yaroslav can you put the pytables package on debian.mentors.net that way it > > would be easier for me to review your package. > > > > thanks > > > > I don't know if Yaroslav has a package to posh in > http://mentors.debian.net too. > > I uploaded my one [1], please consider to give it a look. ok I see at least one problem here :) the version number should be 2.3.1-1.1 -> 2.3.1-1 I did not look further for now but it would be nice to share your packaging efforts under the umbrella of debian-science. Could you look here [1] or here [2], and if you agreed to be part of debian-science, I would set-up an initial pytables git repository for the packaging using all the material available from debian snapshot. cheers, Frederic [1] http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience PS: I saw that you are part of pytables upstream. So in your opinion is there API incompatibilities between the current stable version 2.1.2 and the 2.3.1 version. There is already a few packages depending on python-pytables python-tables Reverse Depends: vitables tessa python-pandas python-dipy python-cfflib so do your think that it could cause troubles to upload 2.3.1 ? thanks Frederic -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel <pi...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
