also sprach wer...@aloah-from-hell.de <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> [2012.01.10.2015 +0100]: > documentation.txt: smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > documentation.txt: smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
I think this is what I was talking about, as well as > man/man8/policyd-weight.8:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > man/man8/policyd-weight.8:smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > policyd-weight:# smtpd_recipient_restrictions = […] > Same here, i also know Postfix well and we have to reduce this bug > to a common denominator :) Technically it remains a sender > restriction which I don't negate. As smtpd_delay_reject is set in > Debian per default it makes no difference where you put it in, > correct. … and when smtpd_delay_reject is set, the suggestions in the documentation cause it to be treated (falsely) like a recipient restriction. I think when I wrote the bug report, I simply said to myself: this should be in smtpd_sender_restrictions by default, and if the admin wants something else, s/he will know what to do. Therefore my suggestion is simply to change the documentation accordingly. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems *** important disclaimer: by sending an email to any address, that will eventually cause it to end up in my inbox without much interaction, you are agreeing that: - i am by definition, "the intended recipient" - all information in the email is mine to do with as i see fit and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. in particular, i may quote it on usenet. - i may take the contents as representing the views of your company. - this overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality that may be included on your message.
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
