also sprach wer...@aloah-from-hell.de <wer...@aloah-from-hell.de> 
[2012.01.11.1123 +0100]:
> He says that it's best practice to define restrictions in
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions (which I also think). It would be
> a bad idea to change that, policyd-weight furthermore also checks
> for recipients (e.g. postmaster handline, etc).

Okay, so it *is* a recipient restriction, of which I was not aware.
Thanks for your efforts!

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"eine schlechte sache erregt, eine gute vertrÃĪgt viel kritik."
                                                    -- charles tschopp

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply via email to